Mediation process, outcomes, and implementation
Intake and entry criteria.
The intake process establishes suitability, defines the dispute precisely, confirms authority to settle, and sets expectations for engagement and timeline. Where governance defects materially drive the dispute, iPowR may recommend parallel governance remediation and, in election-related matters, coordinated EAU involvement to ensure procedural integrity.
Four-stage mediation model.
The mediation proceeds through private sessions with each party, disclosure for written responses, and a joint session at neutral premises in which the panel proposes a settlement framework and facilitates negotiation.
Documentation and follow-up.
If agreement is achieved, terms are documented in a written settlement agreement covering steps, responsibilities, timelines, confidentiality and permitted disclosures, and mechanisms for addressing non-compliance, with optional follow-up checkpoints to support implementation integrity.